翻訳と辞書 |
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP : ウィキペディア英語版 | Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP
''Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP'', often shortened to ''Verizon v. Trinko'', 540 U.S. 398 (2004), is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of Antitrust law. It held that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had not modified the framework of the Sherman Act, preserving claims that satisfy established antitrust standards without creating new claims that go beyond those standards. More importantly, it refused to extend the essential facilities doctrine beyond the facts of the controversial ''Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.'' case. ==See also==
* ''Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002)'' * ''Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2014)'' * List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 540
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|